Editor’s Note: This month, Teaching Tolerance launched a new series of lessons called Issues of Poverty. This week’s featured lesson can be found here.
A student pleads with me at the beginning of class to bring an electronic reader to class?
“I’m almost finished reading my book and I want to finish it, but it’s on my (electronic reader name), the students says. “Please? I’m at a really good part.”
At first, this appears to be every language arts teacher’s dream; students begging to continue reading things they’ve read on their own time for fun.
But, then come the problems.
Our school policy forbids electronics outside of lockers while classes are in session. We’d have to monitor use. Are students actually reading or playing games and instant messaging on their electronic gadget? And perhaps the most challenging: How does allowing electronic readers widen socioeconomic differences in a public school setting?
Author Jeff Sapp reflects on his school experiences in the article How School Taught Me I Was Poor. He recounts the myriad encounters he had that made him feel deficient as a child of a single-parent home growing up in poverty. “Over and over again in school I had been cued both verbally and non-verbally that I was poor. I wasn’t good enough, I didn’t have enough and what I had was the wrong thing,” Sapp writes.
So, when I’m asked if students can bring electronic readers to class, my hesitation is a reflection of Sapp’s experience. I think of Sapp and what caused him to become more and more isolated and ashamed. In one example, Sapp talked about the devastation he felt when a patriotic egg decorating project in third grade clearly displayed his poverty because his mother couldn’t afford extra materials for decorating, unlike other students who used lavish materials to decorate their eggs.
His simple, but carefully colored egg was enough of a difference to make Sapp feel “immense shame about my red, white and blue egg. And then I noticed my classmates’ response to my sad homemade flag. It was pity, pure and simple. It’s the first time I ever remember feeling shame.”
As a teacher, I don’t want the appearance of electronic readers to make a student in poverty feel ashamed. And how can avoid giving the impression that having an electronic reader is some kind of invisible extra credit?
We could have a classroom set of electronic readers to level the playing field. But then we must be mindful that students without regular access to these gadgets may not know how to navigate their use and must learn to do so in front of his or her peers. But perhaps there’s a place we can start, with designated gadget time.
It may not be as simple as deciding whether or not to let students bring their electronic readers from home, but whether or not we are willing to open ourselves to the reality of how we may be perpetuating feelings of shame and inferiority in our classrooms.
Timm is a middle school language arts teacher and creative workshop instructor in Iowa.



Comments
Personally, I think it is
Personally, I think it is more important to teach kids that it is not alright to shame another student for what they do or don't have. Simply taking away an item that could potentially cause these feelings in others does not teach students how to respect others. Instead of eliminating the problem, the issue should be discussed and used as a learning tool.
I do sympathize with Sapp's story about the egg however, the one question that kept popping into my mind was "Why didn't his class mates share with him?" When we are just trying to solve a problem (avoiding shame or feelings of inferiority) we miss the underlying cause.
I just spent months going
I just spent months going through a process of elementary school boundary changes. The stated goal of the School Board was economic redistricting. It was all about "balancing" the number of Free and Reduce Lunch (FRL) children throughout the system. This means that the poorest section of town is divided up into several little sections and are bused to different schools. This also means that some of us go past one (or several) schools in order to have all the "numbers" work out.
Your comment makes me think. How are these kids going to feel now that they are a small minority within each school? Their parents were not present at the meetings and fighting tooth and nail, like we were to keep their neighborhoods together. Their parents were not present to fight for what makes sense for their kids. One idea was to make the new school, which is in a lower economic section of town, a magnet school and give them the resources that those students need, i.e., open early, open later, after school programs and possibly even free dinners. I look around our school and everyone is gone at end of school. There is an after school program but it's not free. Where do those students go after school?
My other reaction to your comment is how do I handle the fact that my kid does have material things and active parents. It almost feels like my child needs to be denied in order to make other children feel better. Is that really the right solution? If I can afford to give my child an ereader or tablet or some other academic advantage, why should they then be denied that advantage. (My children so have iTouches, have access to iPads and have many many books and educational apps that they use daily.)
Just curious as to your reaction.
Ann, I have admired your
Ann,
I have admired your last two pieces of writing on the blog because you ask and discuss difficult questions that need brought to other's attention. I appreciate your thoughtful reflections, and I look forward to reading more of your work in the future.
Ann, I just read your piece
Ann,
I just read your piece and am so thankful that my small narrative touched you. I admire you so much for your obviously strong ethic of caring. Keep up the fantastic work!
Best,
Jeff Sapp