Public School Integration Still ‘Best Goal’

"Share
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

When my daughter pulls hard on the heavy glass doors of the Martin Luther King Jr. Laboratory School and races upstairs into her fifth-grade classroom, she is living my dream.

Thirty-two years ago, when my friends and I pulled hard on those very same glass doors, we were unwitting foot soldiers in the second wave of a revolution we knew nothing about. But it changed our lives.

Our parents–working-class and middle-class African-Americans and whites–volunteered to send us to this “experimental” school because they believed we would learn something essential by learning together. Indeed, many of the white parents, mine included, moved specifically to Evanston, Ill., because of its historic commitment to voluntarily integrating its public schools in the 1960s and 1970s.

Like many cities across the nation, Evanston today is struggling with dramatic re-segregation. Voluntary integration is no longer widely accepted. Residents in our hometown are debating whether or not to launch another school integration effort. But this time, instead of facing cheers, they face weary, frustrated African-American parents and community activists, tired of bearing the burden of busing children away from their neighborhood. There is currently a movement to create an “all-black neighborhood school.”

Racial segregation in our nation’s public schools has risen to a degree unseen since the 1960s. Ambivalence about integration has hardened into hostility. For example, over the past year the school board in Wake County, N.C. abolished the district’s integration policy–killing one of the nation's most renowned public school integration efforts.

There is ample research fully exploring the losses associated with this massive re-segregation – from tumbling standardized test scores to falling grades and dropping class rankings. We must also consider the far less measurable loss of lessons not learned, lives unchanged and friendships not made.

Evanston was right the first time. Integration was—and remains—the best tool and the right goal.

Why?

As a mother, I have seen a difference in my daughter. She was born in a small, homogeneous university town in Oregon. When she was 4 we moved to Cambridge, Mass., for two years. Her world changed from a nearly all-white Oregon town to one of the nation’s most diverse cities. In Cambridge, my daughter’s public school kindergarten class looked like the United Nations. She had friends of all hues and social classes, from several continents representing multiple races, ethnicities and cultures.

We moved back to Oregon when she was 6. During our first week back, she made an observation.  

“Mama, why do the dark-skinned people in Oregon look the same but the ones in Cambridge are all so different?”

I responded, “They don’t. It’s a trick your brain played on you. Here, there are only a few African-American people in town and you don’t see them very often. You don’t know them or go to school with them. In Cambridge, you played with and learned with children from all kinds of backgrounds every single day. Many of your friends were African-American. You knew their personalities, their families and their stories very well. They were your friends. So when you saw them, your brain couldn’t just think only about skin color. Your brain and heart saw the whole person. That’s what happens when you live and learn with all kinds of people. Your brain and your heart open up.”

I recall my childhood. Our collective image of school integration is grainy 1960s television newsreel footage of those brave black students guarded by federal troops, walking tall through mobs of raging whites. The integration I remember, inside what was then called the Martin Luther King Jr. Experimental Laboratory School, was much quieter. Some of us walked. Others were bused from opposite ends of our town at the leafy edge of Lake Michigan.

As children, we spent so much time talking and learning about getting along that now, as adults, we always get there when we start talking: Race, class, power, powerlessness. We dive right in, unafraid, because we learned how to talk to each other, to hear each other, long ago. 

I was reminded again of just this point when I dropped my daughter off at school this morning, at our school. Those doors are still so heavy. I pulled hard. She ran in, vanishing into a swirling circle of friends. I watched, seeing my past, and hopefully, her future.    

Cytrynbaum is a journalist and instructor at Northwestern University.

Comments

You speak of opening those

Submitted by Jon McGahan on 13 September 2011 - 9:46pm.

You speak of opening those glass doors 32 years ago... I went through the original glass doors 45 years ago, and never looked back!

Jon - So I'm assuming you had

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 18 September 2011 - 2:12pm.

Jon - So I'm assuming you had a negative experience or am I misreading your comment? I'd love to hear more about those original, courageous years. I'm not about mythmaking. I genuinely want to hear all the experiences from all perspectives. Only then can we get a real, accurate sense of what happened, what was gained, what was lost and where we need to go from here. Would love to hear more from you. Eithe way, I deeply appreciate you checking in and reading the piece.

You are completely

Submitted by Jon McGahan on 20 October 2011 - 9:02pm.

You are completely misreading. From the day I entered Kindergarten at Lab School (as it was known then), I knew this was where not just I, but everyone belonged. The phrase "never looked back" is used in only the finest, most honorable sense of the term. District 65 made me who I am, and Lab School was where this life journey truly started.

Thank you so much for

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 2 November 2011 - 2:47pm.

Thank you so much for clarifying, Jon. Had we been having a cup of coffee and you made that comment, I would have seen you smile and your eyes shining and I would never have misread it. The good news is the technology connects us. The bad news is it sometimes disconnects us from our real meaning. Either way, lovely to hear from another member of the family.
Peace,
Pam

Pam- Thanks so much for

Submitted by sara esrick on 13 September 2011 - 11:52pm.

Pam-
Thanks so much for posting this! As you know, I too attended King Lab and Evanston High School and what you say rings very true for me: "As children, we spent so much time talking and learning about getting along that now, as adults, we always get there when we start talking: Race, class, power, powerlessness. We dive right in, unafraid, because we learned how to talk to each other, to hear each other, long ago." Thanks for articulating this so well!

Oh Sara, Always wonderful to

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 2 November 2011 - 2:49pm.

Oh Sara,
Always wonderful to hear from members of the Skiles/King Lab family. What a powerful experience for us all.
Hope all is well,
Peace

I agree with you to some

Submitted by Leslie on 15 September 2011 - 1:27pm.

I agree with you to some extent, but what if the integration serves some groups better than it serves other groups? What if some groups feel somehow disadvantaged in an integrated classroom? If the African-American families (of Evanston, say) are sensing a need for an all-black school, who are we whites to say that it would not be a good idea?

Leslie - This is an EXCELLENT

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 18 September 2011 - 2:04pm.

Leslie - This is an EXCELLENT question and deserves much discussion and research. It is distressing to think only the already-advantaged kids get the real benefits. I have had many conversations with African-American classmates about this and some say they see the benefits every single day (as I do) and others say they got far less out of it for a wide range of reasons. It's a crucial part of the discussion.

Having grown up in Evanston,

Submitted by D65 Parent on 15 September 2011 - 2:06pm.

Having grown up in Evanston, I'm familiar with King Lab's important legacy. Now that I'm raising my kid here and am a part of our neighborhood school community, I question the relevance of the magnets. I feel they fracture the community and are a drain on struggling neighborhood schools.
Oakton School is 70% free and reduced lunch. The majority of middle and upper middle class in it's attendance area have chosen magnets and private schools. Why? Oakton kids, when broken down by race, have the same test scores as their counterparts in other D65 schools. We have fantastic teachers, an approachable/responsive principal and small class sizes. We have three different academic strands-- Gen Ed, TWI & ACC, that come together for different enrichment programs. Outstanding arts programming; including an artist-in-residence program through Striding Lion, free drama club, free ceramics club that incorporates harvesting produce from our beautiful "Edible Garden." and free Chess Club (the oldest in the district). Oakton also has Super Saturday School once a month which offers fun academic programming. Best of all it has a really warm, welcoming parent community like I've never experience anywhere else.
So why is it then that you can find whole blocks in Oakton's attendance area where not one family goes to their neighborhood school? Evanstonians boast about how much they love diversity, but that's not quite true. It's socioeconomic differences that divide us and from my S Evanston perspective, the magnets are reinforcing this divide. It's segregation 21st Century style.

District 65 Parent - You

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 18 September 2011 - 2:10pm.

District 65 Parent -
You nailed so many essential issues in your comment. Why? What's the real division? How do we break that down? I know I chose King Lab over our neighborhood school because a) I went there and obviously love it; and b) magnet schools go up through 8th grade and I liked the idea of my daughter remaining in one building with the same kids and not having to do yet another transition into middle school.
I do think the middle school transition element is a crucial part of that decision. Private school is another matter. My sense is that if you choose Evanston but send your kid to private school, you'd send your kid to private school no matter what.
Again, I am speaking personally and not from specific research. In terms of research, there was a study of West Evanston parents that was just released a month or so ago that found that a large percentage were satisfied with the schools their kids were attendeing (many were in the magnets). I'm not sure what that means but it is more information. You are asking all the right questions and cutting through to key points and good clarity. We're lucky to have you --and your kids-- in our community.

Thank you for your thoughtful

Submitted by D65 Parent on 23 September 2011 - 9:13pm.

Thank you for your thoughtful response. I've spent a lot of time thinking about why socioeconomic group has become a more contentious issue than race since coming to Oakton. Best I've come up with is that sending your kid to a school or living in a neighborhood where your worldview is majorly challenged can, at times, be uncomfortable and downright wearisome. It's validating to have conversations with people who share your own points of view. When you put your child out into the world it seems like good parenting to pick a safe, familiar situation. You don't want them to grapple with too much too soon. You want them to go to school with other kids that are ready to learn. I get this and there are days when I wish certain challenges didn't exist. However, the times when I witness kids and/or adults bridging gaps and having conversations that promote understanding, I'm reminded of why we love Oakton and that it feels like a very important part of our family's journey.

Absolutely. It's hard to talk

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 26 September 2011 - 11:44am.

Absolutely. It's hard to talk about the education-readiness and behavior issues because that can feel insensitive. But we have to. We must confront the realities of the classrooms. But there are other realities as well, which you so beautifully describe. As a parent and as a teacher, I want the whole experience for my kids and my students. The global educational experience that comes from integration. There are so many untested, unquantified world lessons that go with that experience. This continues to be a big discussion and I'm so glad you're at the table!

Sometimes children can teach

Submitted by Christine Zeiger on 21 September 2011 - 2:28pm.

Sometimes children can teach us adults so much.
From my own experience growing up in Harlem (New York City), and from raising my own children, I can proclaim that when young children make friends with children from other races, religions, ethnic backgrounds, etc., they will learn a most valuable virtue. Tolerance.
This is what all people really need. Friends from all walks of life.
When you wrote, "In Cambridge, you played with and learned with children from all kinds of backgrounds every single day. Many of your friends were African-American. You knew their personalities, their families and their stories very well. They were your friends. So when you saw them, your brain couldn’t just think only about skin color...", you hit it right on the nailhead.
Once you have true friends from all walks of life, bigotry cannot implant itself in your heart. Somehow, we must find a way for children to grow up together and have real life experiences together.
Thank you for your insight.

Thank YOU for your

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 26 September 2011 - 11:39am.

Thank YOU for your observations and hard work out there.

Also, if you can recommend

Submitted by Christine Zeiger on 21 September 2011 - 2:32pm.

Also, if you can recommend any feature films that promote racial/ethnic/religious tolerance and which are suitable for a family to watch together, I would greatly appreciate your input. Thank you.

I'm afraid most feature films

Submitted by Pamela Cytrynbaum on 26 September 2011 - 11:53am.

I'm afraid most feature films can do more harm than good. They're so often the white-hero in civil rights fight scenario.
I've found that the best and most powerful storytelling goes on in real-life documentaries and on radio -- like This American Life on NPR or StoryCorps, where kids take the mike and tell their own stories of finding eachother. Let me do more research and get you specifics. One of the most inspiring forms of integration for me is spoken-word poetry. Chicago's 'Louder Than a Bomb' documentary and director Kevin Coval's work is life-changing. I'm going to write a post about it, actually.
There was an incredibly powerful documentary done where wealthy, white New Trier students (from Chicago's North Shore) and integrated Evanston Township High School students (my bias, my hometown) were filmed meeting and discussing the massive myths and stereotypes about each other. HUGELY powerful and assumption challenging for the New Trier kids. The Evanston students (from an integrated school) said they felt the other school's kids seemed much more surprised and to learn far more.
Anyway, just another example. Not sure that one has been made public but it should have been. It was done in 2004 I believe.