A media journal project exposes classism in contemporary politics.
In 1787, Virginia statesman George Mason opposed the final draft of the Constitution, in part because he feared that the document failed to encourage "a fellow feeling" between elected officials and the people whom they were to represent. He wrote:
In the House of Representatives, there is not the Substance, but the Shadow only of Representation; which can never produce proper Information in the Legislature, or inspire Confidence in the People: the Laws will therefor be generally made by Men little concerned in, and unacquainted with their Effects and Consequences. ... This Government will commence in a moderate Aristocracy; it is at present impossible to foresee whether it will, in its Operation, produce a Monarchy, or a corrupt oppressive Aristocracy; it will most probably vibrate some years between the two, and then terminate in the one or the other.
Although Mason's concerns regarding an impending monarchy have proven unwarranted, we must take pause and consider the latter option -- the threat of aristocracy.
Do the People Have the Power?
Like Mason two centuries ago, many citizens worry that today's politicians are driven not by the needs or interests of "the people" but rather by the wants and desires of an elite class -- rich and powerful individuals, corporations and special interest groups who fund the bulk of many candidates' election expenses. To promote a more level playing field, some suggest an overhaul of the campaign finance system to reduce the influence of money in politics. But, in recent years, Congress has failed to pass legislation that would accomplish this goal. Representatives and Senators are reluctant to go forth with the reforms, analysts say, because it might hurt their chances for re-election.
While "the people" continue to clamor for changes in how campaigns are financed, many politicians have responded by simply pushing their fundraising efforts into the background and out of the media spotlight. So, who really has the ear of candidates, ask advocates for campaign finance reform, "the people" or "the funders"?