Managing Editor Sean Price's interview with Arizona State University Professor Neal A. Lester. Lester has twice taught courses on the n-word—and found there’s plenty to talk about.
The n-word [2] is unique in the English language. On one hand, it is the ultimate insult- a word that has tormented generations of African Americans. Yet over time, it has become a popular term of endearment by the descendents of the very people who once had to endure it. Among many young people today—black and white—the n-word can mean friend.
Neal A. Lester, dean of humanities and former chair of the English department at Arizona State University, recognized that the complexity of the n-word’s evolution demanded greater critical attention. In 2008, he taught the first ever college-level class designed to explore the word “nigger” (which will be referred to as the n-word). Lester said the subject fascinated him precisely because he didn’t understand its layered complexities.

©Jason Millstein
“When I first started talking about the idea of the course,” Lester recalled, “I had people saying, ‘This is really exciting, but what would you do in the course? How can you have a course about a word?’ It was clear to me that the course, both in its conception and in how it unfolded, was much bigger than a word. It starts with a word, but it becomes about other ideas and realities that go beyond words.”
Lester took a few minutes to talk to Teaching Tolerance managing editor Sean Price about what he’s learned and how that can help other educators.
How did the n-word become
such a scathing insult?
We know, at least in the history I’ve
looked at, that the word started off as
just a descriptor, “negro,” with no value
attached to it. … We know that as early
as the 17th century, “negro” evolved
to “nigger” as intentionally derogatory,
and it has never been able to shed
that baggage since then—even when
black people talk about appropriating
and reappropriating it. The poison
is still there. The word is inextricably
linked with violence and brutality on
black psyches and derogatory aspersions
cast on black bodies. No degree
of appropriating can rid it of that bloodsoaked
history.
Why is the n-word so popular with
many young black kids today?
If you could keep the word within the
context of the intimate environment
[among friends], then I can see that
you could potentially own the word and
control it. But you can’t because the
word takes on a life of its own if it’s not
in that environment. People like to talk
about it in terms of public and private
uses. Jesse Jackson was one of those
who called for a moratorium on using
the word, but then was caught using the
word with a live mic during a “private”
whispered conversation.
There’s no way to know all of its nuances because it’s such a complicated word, a word with a particular racialized American history. But one way of getting at it is to have some critical and historical discussions about it and not pretend that it doesn’t exist. We also cannot pretend that there is not a double standard—that blacks can say it without much social consequence but whites cannot. There’s a double standard about a lot of stuff. There are certain things that I would never say. In my relationship with my wife, who is not African American, I would never imagine her using that word, no matter how angry she was with me. …
That’s what I’m asking people to do—to self-reflect critically on how we all use language and the extent to which language is a reflection of our innermost thoughts. Most people don’t bother to go to that level of self-reflection and self-critique. Ultimately, that’s what the class is about. It’s about selfeducation and self-critique, not trying to control others by telling them what to say or how to think, but rather trying to figure out how we think and how the words we use mirror our thinking. The class sessions often become confessionals because white students often admit details about their intimate social circles I would never be privy to otherwise.
What types of things do they confess?
In their circles of white friends, some
are so comfortable with the n-word
because they’ve grown up on and been
nourished by hip-hop. Much of the
commercial hip-hop culture by black
males uses the n-word as a staple.
White youths, statistically the largest
consumers of hip-hop, then feel that
they can use the word among themselves
with black and white peers. …
But then I hear in that same discussion
that many of the black youths are
indeed offended by [whites using the
n-word]. And if blacks and whites are
together and a white person uses the
word, many blacks are ready to fight. So
this word comes laden with these complicated
and contradictory emotional
responses to it. It’s very confusing to folks on the “outside,” particularly
when nobody has
really talked about the history
of the word in terms of
American history, language,
performance and identity.
Most public school teachers
are white women.
How might they hold
class discussions about
this word? Do you think
it would help them to lay
some groundwork?
You might want to get somebody
from the outside who is
African American to be a central
part of any discussion—
an administrator, a parent,
a pastor or other professional
with some credibility
and authority. Every white
teacher out there needs to
know some black people.
Black people can rarely say
they know no white people; it’s a near
social impossibility. The NAACP would
be a good place to start, but I do not suggest
running to the NAACP as a single
“authority.” Surely there are black parents
of school children or black neighbors
a few streets over or black people
at neighboring churches. The teacher
might begin by admitting, “This is what
I want to do, how would you approach
this? Or, how do we approach it as a
team? How can we build a team of collaboration
so that we all accept the
responsibility of educating ourselves
and our youths about the power of
words to heal or to harm?” This effort
then becomes something shared as
opposed to something that one person
allegedly owns.
How might a K-12 teacher go about
teaching the n-word?
At the elementary level, I can imagine
bringing in children’s picture books to
use in conjunction with a segment on
the civil rights movement, because students
talk about the Rev. Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr. Look at some of the placards
[held by white people at 1960s civil
rights] protests and see if some of them
have been airbrushed or the messages
sanitized. Talk about language, about
words and emotion, about words and
pain. Consider the role of words in the
brutal attacks on black people during
slavery, during Jim Crow, during the civil
rights movement. Consider how words
were part of the attacks on black people.
Depending on how old the students are, a teacher might talk about the violence that involved lynching and castration, and how the n-word was part of the everyday discourse around race relations at the time. Then bring in some hip-hop, depending again on the age. If these are middle school students or high school students, a teacher can talk specifically about hip-hop and how often the n-word is used and in a specific context. … There are many ways that a teacher can talk about the n-word without necessarily focusing on just one aspect—like whether or not Huck should have used the n-word when he references Jim [in Huckleberry Finn]. Any conversation about the n-word has to be about language and thinking more broadly.
What should teachers keep
in mind as they teach about
the n-word?
Remember the case of the
white teacher who told the
black student to sit down
and said, “Sit down, nigga.”
And then the teacher is
chastised by the administration
and of course there is
social disruption. He said, “I
didn’t say ‘Sit down, nigger,’
I said ‘Sit down, nigga,’ and
that’s what I hear the students
saying.” I’m thinking,
first, you are an adult, white
teacher. Secondly, do you
imitate everything that you
see and hear others doing or
saying? At some level, there
has to be some self-critique and critical
awareness and sensitivity to difference.
Just because someone else is doing
it doesn’t mean that I do it even if and
when I surely can.
In my courses, I’m more interested in raising questions than in finding answers to them. I think the questions lead to potential self-discovery. It’s not about whether or not a person uses the n-word. I try to move the class beyond easy binaries—“Well, blacks can use it, but whites can’t.” That line of thinking doesn’t take us very far at all. What we are trying to do, at least the way I have conceptualized and practiced this discovery, is so much more. The class strives to teach us all manner of ways to talk about, think about and to understand ourselves, and each other, and why and how we fit in the rest of the world.
Links:
[1] http://www.tolerance.org/magazine/number-40-fall-2011
[2] http://www.tolerance.org/n-word-straight-talk