The School-to-Prison Pipeline

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version


Illustration by Chris Buzelli

In Meridian, Miss., police routinely arrest and transport youths to a juvenile detention center for minor classroom misbehaviors. In Jefferson Parish, La., according to a U.S. Department of Justice complaint, school officials have given armed police “unfettered authority to stop, frisk, detain, question, search and arrest schoolchildren on and off school grounds.” In Birmingham, Ala., police officers are permanently stationed in nearly every high school.

In fact, hundreds of school districts across the country employ discipline policies that push students out of the classroom and into the criminal justice system at alarming rates—a phenomenon known as the school-to-prison pipeline.

Last month, Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., held the first federal hearing on the school-to-prison pipeline—an important step toward ending policies that favor incarceration over education and disproportionately push minority students and students with disabilities out of schools and into jails.

In opening the hearing, Durbin told the subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “For many young people, our schools are increasingly a gateway to the criminal justice system. This phenomenon is a consequence of a culture of zero tolerance that is widespread in our schools and is depriving many children of their fundamental right to an education.”

A wide array of organizations—including the Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP and Dignity in Schools—offered testimony during the hearing. They joined representatives from the Departments of Education and Justice to shine a national spotlight on a situation viewed far too often as a local responsibility.

“We have a national problem that deserves federal action,” Matthew Cregor, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, explained. “With suspension a top predictor of dropout, we must confront this practice if we are ever to end the ‘dropout crisis’ or the so-called achievement gap.” In the words of Vermont’s Sen. Patrick Leahy, “As a nation, we can do better.”

What is the School-to-Prison Pipeline?
Policies that encourage police presence at schools, harsh tactics including physical restraint, and automatic punishments that result in suspensions and out-of-class time are huge contributors to the pipeline, but the problem is more complex than that.

The school-to-prison pipeline starts (or is best avoided) in the classroom. When combined with zero-tolerance policies, a teacher’s decision to refer students for punishment can mean they are pushed out of the classroom—and much more likely to be introduced into the criminal justice system.

Who’s in the Pipeline?
Students from two groups—racial minorities and children with disabilities—are disproportionately represented in the school-to-prison pipeline. African-American students, for instance, are 3.5 times more likely than their white classmates to be suspended or expelled, according to a nationwide study by the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. Black children constitute 18 percent of students, but they account for 46 percent of those suspended more than once.

For students with disabilities, the numbers are equally troubling. One report found that while 8.6 percent of public school children have been identified as having disabilities that affect their ability to learn, these students make up 32 percent of youth in juvenile detention centers.

The racial disparities are even starker for students with disabilities. About 1 in 4 black children with disabilities were suspended at least once, versus 1 in 11 white students, according to an analysis of the government report by Daniel J. Losen, director of the Center for Civil Rights Remedies of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA.

A landmark study published last year tracked nearly 1 million Texas students for at least six years. The study controlled for more than 80 variables, such as socioeconomic class, to see how they affected the likelihood of school discipline. The study found that African Americans were disproportionately punished compared with otherwise similar white and Latino students. Children with emotional disabilities also were disproportionately suspended and expelled.

In other studies, Losen found racial differences in suspension rates have widened since the early 1970s and that suspension is being used more frequently as a disciplinary tool. But he said his recent study and other research show that removing children from school does not improve their behavior. Instead, it greatly increases the likelihood that they’ll drop out and wind up behind bars.

Punishing Policies
The SPLC advocates for changes to end the school-to-prison pipeline and has filed lawsuits or civil rights complaints against districts with punitive discipline practices that are discriminatory in impact.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the number of school resource officers rose 38 percent between 1997 and 2007. Jerri Katzerman, SPLC deputy legal director, said this surge in police on campus has helped to criminalize many students and fill the pipeline.

One 2005 study found that children are far more likely to be arrested at school than they were a generation ago. The vast majority of these arrests are for nonviolent offenses. In most cases, the students are simply being disruptive. And a recent U.S. Department of Education study found that more than 70 percent of students arrested in school-related incidents or referred to law enforcement are black or Hispanic. Zero-tolerance policies, which set one-size-fits-all punishments for a variety of behaviors, have fed these trends.

Best Practices
Instead of pushing children out, Katzerman said, “Teachers need a lot more support and training for effective discipline, and schools need to use best practices for behavior modification to keep these kids in school where they belong.”

Keeping at-risk kids in class can be a tough order for educators under pressure to meet accountability measures, but classroom teachers are in a unique position to divert students from the school-to-prison pipeline.

Teachers know their students better than any resource officer or administrator—which puts them in a singularly empowered position to keep students in the classroom. It’s not easy, but when teachers take a more responsive and less punitive approach in the classroom, students are more likely to complete their education.

The information in "A Teacher's Guide to Rerouting the Pipeline" highlights common scenarios that push young people into the school-to-prison pipeline and offers practical advice for how teachers can dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline.

>> Avoiding the Pipeline

How can school districts divert the school-to-prison pipeline?
1. Increase the use of positive behavior interventions and supports.
2. Compile annual reports on the total number of disciplinary actions that push students out of the classroom based on gender, race and ability.
3. Create agreements with police departments and court systems to limit arrests at school and the use of restraints, such as mace and handcuffs.
4. Provide simple explanations of infractions and prescribed responses in the student code of conduct to ensure fairness.
5. Create appropriate limits on the use of law enforcement in public schools.
6. Train teachers on the use of positive behavior supports for at-risk students.

>> Toolkit: Want to deepen your understanding of the school-to-prison pipeline

>> Check out our infographic

>> Read the PDF version of this article


What is the correlation for

Submitted by Anonymous on 6 February 2014 - 5:43pm.

What is the correlation for unwed mothers, poverty level, and parent education with the disproportionality?

You need more minority teachers in America schools!

Submitted by Anonymous on 7 April 2014 - 4:04pm.

Most minority teachers understand the children from these types of families. Most teachers that are being hired are not minorities. Many teachers being hired are white females, with a lack of understanding of a diverse culture. Therefore, America has created a bias education in America or a pipeline to prison for minority children, mostly boys. Minority teachers can tap into the reason children who are not supported at home, can find the support at school. I know this is true, because I have spent 26 years doing positive things to keep minority children on the right track.

You know, an educator cannot

Submitted by Anonymous on 5 February 2014 - 7:02pm.

You know, an educator cannot be more of a sympathetic person that you are asking them to be. When an educator is teaching a class and the same student consistently disrupts the class on a daily basis, what is the educator to do? Is the educator supposed to sit and positively request a disruptive student be more polite and behave so he or she can continue to provide instruction? Are they supposed to ignore the behavior and let the disruptive student continue? Is the educator supposed to yell the entire period to attempt to educate the STUDENTS or is it the responsibility of the educator to remove the distraction so the other students that are willing to learn can do so? It has been my experience that if a student is not willing to learn and is being disruptive to the entire class, that it is better and more respectful to the non-disruptive students to remove the distraction. If your data shows that the majority of students removed from class or schools are African American or Latino, then maybe that should tell you about the parents of those children. If those children have no respect for being educated or even a desire to be educated, there is not much any educator can do during a school day to convince them.

I personally think those students that are consistently disruptive require a learning setting that is tailored to their specific slant meaning smaller classes with MUCH more hands on learning. They need to be in a setting where they can relax, they can openly talk, eat, use a partner to complete assignments, understand the rules and learn from others that have either gone before them or have life experiences they can benefit from. But then again, there are some people that just cannot learn from others experiences and will remain defiant until they themselves EXPERIENCE the downfall.

I Don't Know the Answer

Submitted by Anonymous on 22 January 2014 - 3:07pm.

I've been working with at-risk kids my whole career (twenty-six years now) and I have no answer. I do my best to love these kids, but man, the life is being sucked out of me as we speak. With having to implement Common Core and dealing with some very immature boys (twenty-two boys in one of my classes of thirty-five English students), they wipe me out in the fifty-five minutes I have them. And now we're not allowed to send them to our on-campus suspension room, because that now counts as an all-day suspension, even if it's only one period during their day. I feel like teachers' hands are being tied and I have no recourse when there's misbehavior--I move seats, I have private conferences with the student, I call parents--there's nothing else left to me because we now get dinged for writing referrals to the students' administrators for disciplinary action. Talking to parents does little. They have little control over their children; that helps make these kids "at-risk." I understand these kids come from chaotic homes; I came from one of those. But at some point, my high school juniors and seniors need to become responsible for their behavior and actions; otherwise, they will go out into a world that will not tolerate misbehavior in adults or make allowances for illegal behaviors because of what we allow our students to get away with now. Believe me, I am not condoning carting off children to prison for misbehaving in class, but misconduct should not be allowed in our classrooms, either. We're doing our kids a disservice if we teach them they can get away with practically anything.

Diverting the Pipeline Happens in Shifts

Submitted by Anonymous on 22 January 2014 - 5:15am.

I noticed in the article "Diverting the Pipeline Happens in Shifts" the author recommends to set the expectation in the classroom that hurtful words will not be tolerated. I agree, but by not tolerating the hurtful words, by definition, students are going to have be redirected and some will have to receive a consequence. I work at a school where some students will not alter their behavior when verbally redirected and at some point when positive based discipline and redirection fail an actual consequence is needed and if lesser consequences fail then a referral to administration or being kicked out of class may be necessary. For some of my students it takes a severe consequence before their actions change and for others no consequence including the threat of being permanently expelled from school is significant enough to alter their behavior.

Discover More

Submitted by Anonymous on 23 December 2013 - 8:07am.

Where is the fairness for the students who want to learn and are constantly interupted by behaviors in the classroom. Too much blame is placed on schools which are only a reflection of the larger society.


Submitted by Anonymous on 22 December 2013 - 4:17am.

Many of them confide in me that they come from not only poverty stricken homes but also abusive, single-parent, uncaring, or crowded households. They start school trying to do their best but without anyone supporting them they don't know how. I am fortunate that my parents always push me to do better but not every kid has that.


Submitted by Anonymous on 12 October 2013 - 12:24pm.

Social Emotional Learning is the essential piece to this very complex issue. All educators need to be trained to teach and model effective emotional intelligence. EQ. Check out

From A Students Perspective

Submitted by Anonymous on 20 September 2013 - 2:45pm.

I am a senior high school student in a public school system. I am neither Dark skinned nor Latino but I do understand the truth of the school to prison pipline. In my city's public school system I watch as my freinds and clasmates struggle to do better. They start to adjust to what is expected of them because they feel hopeless without the support and trust of the adults around them.

Some of my classmates have been problem children since grade school because there was no one there to help them strive for more. Many of them confide in me that they come from not only poverty stricken homes but also abusive, single-parent, uncaring, or crowded households. They start school trying to do their best but without anyone supporting them they don't know how. I am fortunate that my parents always push me to do better but not every kid has that.

My current High School has gained new policies within the start of this school year that has made the atmospere more like a prison. The policies were put in place by Central Office not the school itself. There was never a history of violence yet they decide to add more security because people who have never even stepped into the school think we are soon-to-be criminals. Now each day I must walk through a metal detector while having my personal items checked. Before these policies the school was one of the best in the district. I always felt content to go to school, my teachers encouraged me to try, and I felt safe, nothing like when I was in Middle School, but now that might not continue. The new security puts students more on edge and I feel like they might do somthing they will regret. What happen to "give trust to earn it", my school has never done anything to lose the trust so why can't the Board trust the students. Without trust the students will not respect the teachers.

I am afraid of what will happen if the comfortable atmospere my school once had dissapears. I love my school but now its starting to feel suffocating. I don't want to see it change for the worse because of this so-called "extra safety". My teachers are trying to help but they have their own problems due to the loss of their union. I don't know what to do but I hope this strange system will stop before the students, especially the freshman, start to adust to criminal treatment.

You Must Organize!

Submitted by Anonymous on 22 January 2014 - 2:39pm.

Please, please, please, you must begin gathering your classmates and parents to get the word out about how your school has changed for the worst. Go speak at the next Board of Education meeting and tell your local press (print and TV) what you are doing, which is fighting to take your school back. Your teachers (I am a teacher) have no power to do this, especially without a union (they could easily lose their jobs), so you must take the leadership here. These Board of Ed. people don't know what it's like at your school, so you must tell them and all the better if you do it with lots of witnesses looking on. Nothing will change unless you take action, so I encourage you to do it. I think they will listen to you more than they would listen to teachers, so please fight for your school!

Thank you for sharing.

Submitted by Anonymous on 12 October 2013 - 11:16am.

Thank you for sharing. Teachers are listening!

I felt sad to know that

Submitted by Anonymous on 20 September 2013 - 1:10am.

I felt sad to know that police routinely arrest and transport youths to a juvenile detention center for minor classroom misbehaviors. Education system is degraded and needs a revolution. We create workers for the system with this setup. Nothing else.

California Juvenile Hall Educator

Submitted by Anonymous on 5 June 2013 - 12:19am.

Wow, was one of the first words that came to my mind as I read this article. I am a juvenile hall educator for girls. Currently, I have 30 girls ranging from 13-18 yrs old. One of my biggest jobs is behavior issues. Something that most these girls share, besides the obvious, is lack of responsibility. If we let kids misbehave, blame others, including bad parents, for their situation then we might as well pack it in and give up. We are giving these kids a crutch to make poor decisions and not giving them the responsibility they need to make good ones. Many kids grow up in, let's just say it, "sucky" conditions yet they still stay out of trouble and make better choices for themselves. I am one of them. I grew up in an abusive home both sexually and physically. My mom was so worried about my step father going to jail or my grandfather (yes two male role models in my life) not being able to make it in jail that I was left to handle it on my own. Feeling depressed, responsible for the situation, alone and betrayed. I struggled for many years yet here I am a teacher, mother, wife and responsible citizen. I am far from perfect and my past is probably what drives me to work with these type of kids but my point is we all have choices to make and kids locked up are removed from their poor choices, taught new stratgies, and at least in my classroom told they can succeed and can be more then their situation. We need to get these kids, and parents, to take responsibility for who they are. The situation may be a reason but is not the excuse!

California Juvenal Hall Educator

Submitted by Anonymous on 18 December 2013 - 5:58pm.

I fear for the Children under your charge. Obviously you tried to solve major abuse problems on your own. I think you failed. Your approach seem to be more about you than about the children in your charge. What is a 13 year old being "dumped" into a group with 18 year olds? These children have no control and yet you expect them to "take responsibility". This is up to date with with your 1800's approach to child rearing and education.

Ronald M. Scanlon

California Juvenile Hall Educator

Submitted by Anonymous on 22 January 2014 - 5:33am.

Ronald, I take it that you are not familiar with how the system works or how students with behavior issues are treated on a regular basis. In my district there is one alternative school where students ranging from 6 years old to 19 years old attend. They all ride the same bus and eat in the same cafeteria. This is outrageous but it is option the school system was willing to fund. What is your basis for saying these children have no control? At what point do you feel a person has control? If not by 16, when most states allow them to drive, then when do they have control? If not by 18, when they can fight and die in our armed forces, when? Your comment about the previous person's reply failing to solve major abuse problems on her own reveals your depth of compassion for other people.

That's wonderful that you

Submitted by Anonymous on 12 October 2013 - 12:02pm.

That's wonderful that you were able to overcome your horrible situation, and go on to be a responsible adult. Some of us have the inner strength to do that. Unfortunately, not all do. Some need more help than others. They need to know that people DO care about them, are trustworthy, and are there to support and encourage them. I'm glad that you are doing that in your classroom. Many young people have no adult that they feel they can trust. When they act up in class - even a minor infraction - off to jail they go. No wonder they don't trust anyone! These kids need to know that they are indeed worthwhile human beings, who deserve better, and to be shown how that works. They need help in taking responsibility for who they are. They can't do that until they know they are worth it. Thanks for your work.

Very very sad. Behaviour

Submitted by jacek on 1 September 2013 - 6:26am.

Very very sad. Behaviour issues is one of my biggest problems as well, so at least there are 2 of us right?? :) Anyway, thanks for your inspirational comment, it really made me feel a little better somehow. Have an amazing day and best of luck

This is a very sad

Submitted by Anonymous on 24 July 2013 - 6:30am.

This is a very sad phenomenon. It is the first time I have heard of such term but I am aware of such incidence. This is especially true to those falling below the poverty line and it is that reason that pushes them.

What's the real solution?

Submitted by Anonymous on 9 February 2013 - 10:02pm.

I'm in a DAEP and would like to share the 'other side of the coin'. Most of our student's 'parents' have totally thrown their children away. They come from disfunctional situations and many years ago, CPS would have had authority and cause to remove them from the home. Not today. They are abused and/or exposed to situations that many of us, including myself, would never have dreamed people would do to their children. 99% of our students are in single-family settings, and many of those are being raised by a grandparent. A few of their parents, one or both, are incarcerated but I don't see any mention of the cycle repeating itself in the article. So what is a teacher to do? Expose the other 27 students to continual disruptions, language, disrespect and out-right defiance that these students thrive on? Many of them do this because they are so un-educated, due to their unchecked behavior in early years, that it's better to be thrown out of class then to let everyone know that they have no idea what the teacher is talking about.

Unfortunately, in the case of the SPED students, it's a worse scenario, in my opinion. Mainstreaming, in theory, is an excellent idea. Modifying mainstreaming would benefit the student much more because these students don't traditionally have the social skills nor the behavioral capability to compete in the classroom on equal footing. Although some are given many more opportunities to disrupt and disturb the classroom (for example, some of their BIPs or IEDs allow them to say 'profanity words' up to _____ times a day), I must question why in the world we would want the other students continually exposed to this type of behavior and then pass it off by saying, 'Well, he has special needs'. Who in the world benefits by that? And my daughter is special needs to please don't think that I don't see both arguments.

I don't believe zero-tolerance policies feed these trends of arresting students, targeting black or Hispanic students. I do believe that caring parents and administrators have concluded that continued bullying of others, bringing drugs to school for their use or to sell to others and coming to school drunk or high warrant immediate and swift consequences to protect not only the students but staff members, as well. I promise you, at least in my district, the behavior and actions of the student, not the color of their skin or heredity, is the only factor that determines the consequence.

Last comment: after the last school shooting, every single district in the nation, I hope, looked at their policies for keeping our students and staff safe, or at least doing all they could to slow down/deter that type of horrific action. Officers on campuses, again I'm speaking of our district, are not there to discipline the students. In fact, staff members are not allowed to call the officer to remove a student or intervene during disruptive behavior. The principal is the only one who has the authority to do that but, just like the patrol car sitting on the side of the road slows down traffic (at least until they pass him/her) the presence of a uniformed officer does make a difference. The officers represent law and authority but they also are very instrumental in making a connection with the students that need positive role models and encouraging them that they have the potential to be more than what they see or live at home. I hear the officers do much more 'counseling' than arresting.
I'm sorry this is so long and I truly wish that wasn't any need for a DAEP setting in any district but we're growing by 11% each year and, since we've started taking 4th graders, those numbers are exploding, too. It's a sad situation, and one that parents have complete control over but they choose not to so we're left to raise their kids the best way we can without compromising the safety and well-being of the students as a whole.

No easy fix

Submitted by Anonymous on 11 February 2013 - 5:56pm.

Anyone who works with high poverty kids knows that the pipeline starts long before these kids enter school. It is unfair to blaim schools for the problems perpetuated by a cycle of poverty that our nation refuses to address. I have been a PBIS, positive discipline trainer and advocate in the public school system for many years and I have to say that this article is extremely one sided. While there are many things that we can do to improve on our responses to these students, it is unrealistic to fail to hold students responsible for their behavior. Teaching students that there are consequences for their actions is a critical component of their education. It is unfair to expect teachers to put up with disrespectful and disruptive behavior that stops other students from learning. I agree that suspensions aren't the answer to changing behavior. We must put interventions in place to help keep them in school. Extremes on both sides of this issue do nothing to help these students. But to pretend that it is as simple as changing a teacher's response to these extremely disruptive and disturbed students is an unfair portrayal of the realities faced in schools daily. It may be politically incorrect to say, but the pipeline starts with poverty and upbringing. It can only be solved by putting support systems in place that address both home and school. It takes a village...

Slowing the Pipeline

Submitted by Anonymous on 2 February 2013 - 11:22am.

I worked as a police officer in a "minority" area for twenty years. I began working in a school district as a police officer. My wife has been a teacher in a "minority" school for almost twenty years. My mother worked in "minority" schools for nearly thirty years. I understand both sides of this story. One one hand, schools are becoming a "pipeline to prison". On the other hand, teachers are being required to become "parents" to the children they teach.

The fact is many minority children come to their school looking for parental guidance and for parental support from their teachers. Yes, parents of these children often relinquish their responsibilities, giving them to those in authority (educators, police officers, etc). We can argue why this happens, and we can place the blame squarely on the parents.

Having said that, this situation provides an awesome opportunity for educators, police officers, and others in authority to make an impact on these students' lives. Often times, these people in authority do not take time to find out why the student is acting out. If the child does not fit into the "norm", or disrupts the class, the educator has them removed, so their class can return to "normal".

I wonder what would happen if schools began to deal with and accept, not only the educational issues of students, but their new role as "parental figures".

School has to change its

Submitted by Anonymous on 18 May 2013 - 1:55am.

School has to change its purpose in the inner city before I can expect you to learn in a classroom you first have to understand school and on a larger scale societal norms. That's just my two cents.

That is a sad reality of life

Submitted by Anonymous on 20 September 2013 - 11:16pm.

That is a sad reality of life but the good thing is that we can actually do something to help change that.

I am an educator and I do see

Submitted by Anonymous on 21 March 2013 - 12:59am.

I am an educator and I do see myself as a parent to the students I teach during the day, and some even call me "momma". I am a parent also. When I send my son to school the adult who is in charge of him is going to have to function as a surrogate parent during the day. Not because my child isn't being parented at home, but simple because that comes with being an educator. Our society has gotten away from the saying "it takes a village to raise a child". In many minority communities this is how things operate or did operate. I don't think you can effectively teach a child without looking at each student and saying that this is someones child and respecting them as such and treating them in the same manner as you would want your child treated. I also believe it is difficult for non-minorities to teach minority students simple due to a lack of cultural understanding/awareness. You simply can not teach something/someone you know nothing about, well you can, but it will be a challenge.


Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 10:12pm.

The article stated that since the 1970's there has been a increase in the number of African American students in comparison to their white counterparts. This is not a surprise considering that the 70's were the honeymoon period for the Civil Rights Era. The abuses that African Americans had suffered and were still suffering was in the forefront of many of the minds of the caregivers of the children attending school during this time. As a result the children of the 70's heard the life experiences of their grandparents and parents. This in itself I'm certain was encouraging and motivational. The push to encourage African American children to excel was more prominent in the 70's In addition children were reminded frequently of the opportunities available to them as a result of hard work in school, and reminded not to squander these opportunities. This continues to be the case in the homes of their white counter parts, but is not the case in a majority of African American homes. I have seen posts on Facebook when school is out for Professional Development of parents complaining that their children do not have school and will have to stay home with them instead of seeing this as an opportunity to teaching; being that they are their children's first teachers. With all of this said, if parents do not support and encourage their children where education is concerned the only person left to do so will be the educator that they are forced out of the door to see each morning. School has to change its purpose in the inner city, because before I can expect you to learn in a classroom you first have to understand school and on a larger scale societal norms. That's just my two cents.

Simply being disruptive

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 8:52am.

Stop and think about how much educational time is lost while a student is "simply being disruptive". There are likely 30 other students that are pulled away from engaging in learning. Many of the reactions from schools (as far as punishments) are usually the reponse from an outcry of parents who are fed up with their child missing out on an education due to the behavior of a few. A large reason for parents sending their children to parochial, private and charter schools is the fact that those schools don't have to put up with poorly behaved children.
Also, stating that students with emotional disabilities are punished more often...imagine a class of 31 seventh grade students in the midst of a lesson and you have a child pick up a desk and throw it? When the author experiences this (and the reaction from the students and parents that follow) please inform me of how to deal with that situation. I am really at a loss.

Reply to Simply Being Disruptive

Submitted by Anonymous on 12 October 2013 - 1:36pm.

Well said, I have been in education for over 35 years. There have never been answers and solutions for the disruptions of learning that take place everyday which are usually committed by only a few students. We have failed all students and families by not providing a well rounded educational system that engages everyone in exposure to college preparatory, vocational training, daily living skills, and work experience. Common Core Standards and No Child Left Behind acts are doing a disservice to all individuals involved, in assuming all students are preparing for college and university programs. For many students, today's high schools are providing a meaningless experience.

Thank you.

Submitted by Anonymous on 31 January 2013 - 10:58pm.

Thank you.

School-to-Prison Pipeline

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 8:11am.

Why is there no mention of what parents can do for their children? The child is ultimately the parents' responsibility. When children live in an environment where values and morals are not taught, they are not going to learn how to function in society. The schools are not the problem. Schools are left to deal with the problem of poor parenting. Parents need to take responsibility for their children and teach them right from wrong! I am a mother and a public school teacher - I see these problems every day. I am tired of everyone making public school the scapegoat for societies problems. Until parents start taking responsibility for their children, and teach them morals and values, our society will continue to spiral downward.

While you are right, until we

Submitted by Anonymous on 16 May 2013 - 1:41pm.

While you are right, until we can make parents do the parenting, we just have to do what we can.

Parents are educational stakeholders as well...

Submitted by Anonymous on 2 February 2013 - 12:04am.

Parents are educational stakeholders as well, and an integral part of the solution. If parents do not take some of the responsibility to teach respect for teachers, school and the importance of education, teachers cannot miraculously make this a reality for their students. Certainly, we can do as much as possible, but if we are going to seek "realistic" solutions, we can not ignore the fact that parents have to help and partner with teachers to help students break the cycle of "Pipeline to Prison" issue.

Why no mention of parents?

Submitted by Teaching Tolerance on 31 January 2013 - 1:51pm.

The reason there is no mention of what parents can do for children is that Teaching Tolerance magazine is a magazine for teachers. Although we know that many parents do read our magazine, they are not our main audience. We write primarily for teachers, counselors and administrators in K-12 schools and for other people working in instructional settings with youth. So, our articles are always going to be "here's what you can do as a school-based professional." We do understand and sympathize with the tremendous responsibility society is placing on schools and teachers, and our mission is to help provide research-based strategies that help the people working in schools.

Why no mention of parents?

Submitted by Anonymous on 3 February 2013 - 10:55am.

I strongly agree with your decision not to mention parents in "The School-to-Prision Pipeline" article. Too often educators make comments such as, "These parents don't care about their children" or "The students attitudes and bad behavior start at home - so what can I do?". My response to any educator who beleives that blaming the parent negates teachers' responsibility to, at least, attemtp to break the cycle, quite frankly, need to leave the profession.
I teach 6th grade core plus a 7th & 8th grade elective in an urban setting - 94 students total; everyone of them knows that I will do everything in my power to provide them with the knowledge to empower themselves. Teachers and other educators are just as guilty for feeding the pipeline as those we accuse of not caring.
Please continue to provide thought-provoking articles that guide educators in the direction of reflective growth.

More support

Submitted by Anonymous on 29 January 2013 - 10:15pm.

Part of the solution-oriented ideas presented here speak to the need more teacher support in schools. There is a definite lack of school mental health counselors in most schools. In my county, there is generally one school counselor covering between three and five schools. Hopefully with the spotlight being shined on the recent unfortunate events in Sandy Hook and across the country, the government will realize the need to increase these numbers. Guidance counselors have their place, but school mental health counselors are where we fall short and miss the opportunity to create a healing, nurturing bridge between school and home.

The school-to-prison pipeline

Submitted by Anonymous on 29 January 2013 - 1:14pm.

Children are more susceptible to negative punishment then loving corrective measures. To put any child in prison based on disciplinary measures will never turn a child around but reinforce their intolerable actions.
Comment by Tobias A. Weissman


Submitted by Anonymous on 29 January 2013 - 9:29pm.

...but in your first sentence, please change the word "then" to "than" for grammatical correctness, so that your good points will be more persuasive.

Zero Tolerance Policies?

Submitted by Anonymous on 25 January 2013 - 3:03pm.

This article seems to put most of the blame on schools and teachers. I see no mention of what parents can do at home to prevent their children from winding up in these types of situations. For far too long many of these children have lived with parents who do not promote or support education. What are teachers and schools to do when all attempts to resolve behavioral issues with parents have fallen on deaf ears. Zero Tolerance is what schools have been forced into adopting. Schools have a responsibility to teach children that society also has a zero tolerance. There are consequences for all of our actions. If that is not being taught at home, unfortunately it is up to teachers to do it at school.

Thank you for your comment.

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 10:31pm.

Thank you for your comment. As a middle school teacher, my biggest challenges are correcting the damages that the media and often parents are doing to my students perception of what life will be like in the real world.

Zero Tolerance Policies

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 9:31am.

I would agree with the above. Accountability should start at home. More shcools are becomming the parent. teahcer, social worker all in an attempt to get a child to learn. If they are not ready to learn at school then the disruptions continue. Where is the fairness for the students who want to learn and are constantly interupted by behaviors in the classroom. Too much blame is placed on schools which are only a reflection of the larger society.

What are best practices in this regard?

Submitted by Anonymous on 25 January 2013 - 10:03am.

We struggle with this issue at our school. It is especially difficult when students are not succeeding academically and behaviors interfere with other students' learning. How do we help all students? You mentioned the best practices - what are those? We seem to have limited options.

Best Practices that may help....

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 8:45am.

Some "best practices" that we use and have seen positive feedback in the NC has the PBIS iniative. Google PBIS and see if it is something you think your school could use... or you can email me as to how I have seen this system implemented.

Why no mention of Schools Beating Children?

Submitted by Anonymous on 24 January 2013 - 8:57am.

Mississippi, Texas and Alabama are the top states for the number of incidents of Violent School Corporal Punishment of Children, even disabled, Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade by Mandatory Child Abuse Reporters, School teachers, coaches and administrators hitting them with wooden boards/paddles to inflict Pain Punishment for minor infractions (assault in public) with No Safety Standards remains Legal in 19 US States, AL, FL and TN among states that Do Not Require parental consent or notification for children to be hit in school! See brutally violent injuries to schoolchildren from US Public School Corporal Punishment at YouTube video trailer for Documentary Movie "The Board of Education" by Jared Abrams. The ACLU recommended enactment of Federal Bill HR 3027 "The Ending Corporal Punishment in Schools Act" Cost $0, at the Groundbreaking Senate Hearing to End the School-to-Prison-Pipeline held 12/12/12. Search "A Violent Education" 2008 Study by Human Rights Watch and ACLU for disturbing facts. School Corporal Punishment is already Illegal in Schools in 31 US States and Prohibited by Federal Law for use against convicted Felons in ALL US Prisons! dont hit students dot com

Texas teacher here...

Submitted by Anonymous on 30 January 2013 - 2:50pm.

I am part of a vast network of public educators in Texas and in all the conversations I have ever had with any of the educators in ANY of these hundreds of districts has anyone mentioned knowing of a district employee "beating children". It is "legal" in Texas to employ corporal punishment, however the liability associated with punishing students like that is so great, most school districts have locally applied bans. Just because the law allows it doesn't mean school districts must employ it. As long as the local jurisdiction does not contradict the state laws, it is acceptable for their rules to be different.

I would suggest having more evidence before spouting forth such ignorant information. I have been in the classroom for 10 years as an educator and 30 years as the daughter of public educators. In no school district I've been associated with has "violent injury" to children been a part of discipline!

Shifting from "bad kids" to "sick kids"

Submitted by Anonymous on 23 January 2013 - 3:01pm.

Clearly, the pipeline needs to be broken. We also need to be aware that it will be tempting for schools to shift from seeing kids as "bad" to seeing them as "ill," or from disorderly to disordered. The temptation comes from wanting to do the right thing, but it can still result in fixing a debilitating stigma to a student--a stigma that can be very difficult to shake. I've been sharing more about this dynamic at the following blog, and invite people's comments and questions:

Josh Bornstein

Shifting from "bad kids" to "sick kids"

Submitted by Anonymous on 29 January 2013 - 7:16pm.

Schools have already shifted to this extreme by medicating children under the guise of ADHD (Attention Deficet with Hyperactivity Disorder)
This is a totally made up disease, one highly profitted from. Sadly the same groups of children in the school-to-prison-pipeline, poor, disabled, and children of color, are targeted. This disease does not exist. It can traced to its origins in a book, "The Diseasing of America's Children" by Dr. John Resmond~a must read for all. The pipe-line is alive & doing quite well here in Massachusetts, among many other states, and surely must be broken, and broken now. Our future is at stake. The future of our children is at stake. I work with a small group addressing this in our local schools. The first step is to make aware the administration~this is not an easy step, one we have been working on for over a year now. Until they can realize its existence, the work can not begin to break down this viscous cycle.

Shifting from "bad kids" to "sick kids"

Submitted by Anonymous on 1 February 2013 - 1:54pm.

You are correct about one thing here, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is not a disease. It is a disorder that effects how a person's brain processes information. In my teaching experience, I have seen seven true cases of ADHD in children and adults. The cases range from upper middle class to lower middle class. One case was an African American male and one was a Europrean American male. The other five cases were European American females. Disorders, and disesases, know no social boundaries. Perhaps there have not been true cases in your experience, but your intollerance for medical diagnoses is one that I though this organization was trying to change.

I just read all of the above

Submitted by Anonymous on 31 January 2013 - 10:57pm.

I just read all of the above comments but I don't feel medication is only targeted to the "poor, disabled, and children of color", at least in my district. It may not be the answer and I totally agree. However, medication also has no "tolerance" and is given to all students. You're welcome to come to my class of 30-plus any day and witness reality rather than your "small group" and make decisions for the rest of us. Massachusetts right now sounds like a different world.